In the realm of professional management , there are events of professional negligence that are overlooked, and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, epitomizes such a situation— a chronicle of dubious professional actions that deeply harms the reputation of a solitary executive but brings scrutiny over the enterprise’s integrity.

Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has kept his position , seemingly unaffected by the controversies engulfing him. How has this been allowed to persist ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? From what insiders reveal , Collins’ history of unprofessional conduct began with breaches of the business principles, but it didn’t end there . Instead, it intensified into a pattern of misconduct that has left colleagues jaded and partners bewildered .

During a leadership training program — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities —David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a serious training session into a chain of irresponsible incidents . Insiders suggest he spent organization-paid excursions pursuing romantic liaisons , a glaring violation of Ventia’s business principles , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .

But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a blatant abuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including symbols celebrating indiscretions— exposes a personality of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in physical relationships with an employee on multiple occasions during work time , despite his being married and her having a spouse . This blatant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but led to familial breakdowns —creating a trail of betrayal Ventia New Zealand that extended well beyond the business environment .

Why can this behavior be allowed to endure ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly shattered all norms is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it Ventia Expose appears, stems from a worrisome failure of governance within the organization . Issues have been raised , yet Collins operates without restraint .

This absence of retribution conveys a risky precedent : that authority and prestige within the enterprise can serve as a safeguard. It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , dispirits the workforce , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .